Clearvolt

Debunking Electric Vehicles Myths

Debunking Electric Vehicles Myths

Debunking Electric Vehicles Myths

Myth 1: Excessive Cost of Electric Vehicles Compared to Petrol Cars

The common perception of electric vehicles (EVs) as more expensive than their petrol counterparts is a superficial view. A comprehensive assessment considering the Total Cost of Ownership, which encompasses running costs, maintenance, insurance, and tax benefits (EVs are exempt from road tax until 2025), reveals a different picture. Industry authorities, including What Car? magazine, underscore this by showcasing models like the Cupra Born, which blends performance with economical operation.

Myth 2: High Expense of Charging an EV Compared to Petrol Refilling

It’s a widespread misconception that EV charging is uniformly costly. Justin Costello, National Fleet Manager of Cupra, clarifies that charging expenses, much like petrol prices, vary by location. He recommends home charging during off-peak hours for cost savings, noting that full charges are not always necessary.

Myth 3: Limited Range of EVs

Technological advancements have significantly increased the range of EVs. For example, the Cupra Born offers a range of up to 342 miles on a single charge. Martin Gray, a Contract Hire and Leasing Manager, points out that such a range is more than sufficient for most drivers, who rarely drive for extended periods without stopping. He suggests using journey-planning apps for efficient EV usage and charging.

Myth 4: Insufficient EV Charging Infrastructure

The UK’s EV charging network has expanded considerably, with approximately 50,000 charging points across 30,000 locations as of August this year, marking a 40% increase from the previous year. Mark Penny, an Area Fleet Manager, notes that the perceived scarcity of charging points is often unfounded, especially after drivers begin regularly using EVs.

Myth 5: Frequent Battery Replacement and Issues with Recycling

Environmental concerns regarding EV batteries are being addressed through technological advancements and recycling initiatives. Cupra, for instance, employs batteries with an eight-year lifespan that are fully recyclable. Justin Costello suggests repurposing these batteries for home solar arrays. Volkswagen’s Salzgitter plant is a pioneer in battery recycling, successfully reclaiming over 90% of valuable materials.

Debunking these myths underscores the viability and necessity of transitioning towards electric vehicles. This shift is not just a matter of technological advancement or economic consideration; it is a crucial step towards combating climate change. Embracing EVs represents a collective effort to reduce carbon emissions, foster sustainable practices, and pave the way for a cleaner, greener future. For professionals and businesses alike, understanding and supporting this transition is fundamental in our shared responsibility to protect the environment for future generations.

Source

Ryan, A. (n.d.). Do electric vehicles really cost less than ICE cars to maintain? [online] www.fleetnews.co.uk. Available at: https://www.fleetnews.co.uk/electric-fleet/policy/are-service-and-maintenance-costs-for-electric-vehicles-really-cheaper.